Notation Software Users Forum  


Go Back   Notation Software Users Forum > Musician community sharing > Share Your Music
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search New Posts

Share Your Music Share your .not or .mid files of your arrangements or compositions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-02-2006, 08:49 AM
M G Jacobs (mgj32)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default I have hesitated to post this

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-02-2006, 03:30 PM
Fred Winterling (harbor1)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hello MG, Wow, what a brill

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-02-2006, 06:21 PM
M G Jacobs (mgj32)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hi Fred, Thanks for the com

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-02-2006, 06:56 PM
Fred Winterling (harbor1)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hi MG, Thanks for the suggest

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-02-2006, 07:39 PM
M G Jacobs (mgj32)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hi Fred, At least some, if

Hi Fred,

At least some, if not most, of the drum staves could be one line if you have only one instrument per staff. In any case, you could hide inactive staves, and that would give you less clutter.

Let's just both move to the tropics and we can both have fun watching the curious neighbors come out to see the parade.

Cold here, too. And I don't like it.

best,
mgj
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-03-2006, 03:50 PM
Dr Peter Kalve
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Quite a few interesting ideas,

Quite a few interesting ideas, but I feel you need to look at the overall shape of phrases - and especially where phrases begin and end - it is often quite difficult to tell! One other thing - my composition teacher always told me to write for what is possible - some of your recommended tempi would be almost impossible for virtuoso performers.

Having said all that, I do like some of the comtrasting ideas you have used. In addition, the sheer scale of the piece suggests a lot of work to get all those notes sorted out. So overall, interesting ideas in part, but a somewhat confused structure.

Now I shall duck for cover!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-09-2006, 09:13 AM
M G Jacobs (mgj32)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dr. Kalve, Many thanks for

Dr. Kalve,

Many thanks for your helpful comments. I'm afraid I don't think much (consciously) about phraseology when I'm writing--that is mostly a process of getting on paper what I have imagined; so I certainly wouldn't quibble with an analysis that finds it faulty. I can see, too, why there might be structural confusion. I tend to think in standard forms, but I also tend to make departures, usually after hesitating at first, when intuition tells me I would like the piece better if I did so. My only criterion for judging a piece is my listening enjoyment, and that standard could easily produce source material for a critical field day for anyone who doesn't enjoy it. But at my age, it seems more important to get the imagined stuff written before the years run out.

I am really glad you brought up the playability issue. The clarinetist I had in mind was as much wizard as virtuoso, but the instrument itself has limitations, and I have found several places where I will have to do some re-writing, for both instruments.

all best,
mgj
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Notation Software Germany GmbH www.notation.com/Imprint.php